I disagree. Film still has a nuance that digital photo sensors can't replicate, even on the expensive $3,000 professional models. On the other hand, the lazy side of me hasn't gotten around to developing some film from a few months ago. And by a few months ago, I mean last February. So yeah, I carry a digital with me every day. But when I'm being fancy, film still rocks out more than digital.
Started in 2004 to chronicle a Vancouver to New York drive, this is a sporadic blog about being from New York, living in Boston, working coast to coast, learning through constant travel, starting a rock band, technology, writing, photography, music, urban planning, transportation, and other things that interest me.
6 Comments:
still prefer film
EXPENSIVE AND OBSOLETE.
This post has been removed by the author.
you own a record player. and guitars. why not just use a computer program to make music?
digicams can do anything film cams can. the same is not true with computers and musical instruments.
I disagree. Film still has a nuance that digital photo sensors can't replicate, even on the expensive $3,000 professional models. On the other hand, the lazy side of me hasn't gotten around to developing some film from a few months ago. And by a few months ago, I mean last February. So yeah, I carry a digital with me every day. But when I'm being fancy, film still rocks out more than digital.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home